TL Sport Aircraft Gets MOSAIC Ready

TL Sport Aircraft is hardly a stranger to the U.S. market with a diverse product line of two-place airplanes powered by a variety of Rotax powerplants and featuring well-equipped Garmin avionics. At Sun ‘n Fun 2026 it was showing the Sparker, the Stream, and the Sirius models that are all MOSAIC-ready. AvBrief’s Larry Anglisano spent some time at the exhibit for a look at the airplanes with TL Sport’s North American distributor rep Trey Murdaugh.

Larry Anglisano
Larry Anglisano
Larry Anglisano is editor of Smart Aviator and Instrument Aviator. He is an active land, sea, and glider pilot with over 25 years experience as an avionics specialist.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Latest

Not Quite NORDO

Related

6 COMMENTS

Subscribe to this comment thread
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Aaron
Aaron
5 months ago

Great! More aircraft out of reach for the common man pilot.

David Bunin
David Bunin
Reply to  Aaron
5 months ago

New production airplanes have never been in-reach for the common man pilot. That’s why we all buy used airplanes. There will always be some rich dude who bought the new airplane in the first place.

Aaron
Aaron
Reply to  David Bunin
5 months ago

I was under the impression the LSA category and now MOSAIC were/are intended to bring the cost of design/engineering/production down and therefore the price. Directly from the FAA site: “MOSAIC increases the availability of safe, modern, and affordable aircraft for recreational aviation, flight training, and certain aerial work.”

What appears to be happening is the inputs are perhaps lower while the margins are higher but the bottom line of affordability hasn’t moved. So why bother with MOSAIC in the first place?

jpayne
jpayne
Reply to  Aaron
5 months ago

They said the same thing back over 20 years ago with the original Sport Pilot/Light Sport regs. We aren’t going to get cheaper planes now for the same reason we didn’t get cheaper planes back then. The people who have the money to buy a new MOSIAIC Light Sport airplane now also have the money to get every bell and whistle the manufacturers can fit within the regs. That immediately prices those out of the range of most normal people.

Back when they were making the original SP/LS regs the FAA thought that people would want to fly around in what were effectively supposed to be fat ultralights. That’s why they set the weight limit at 1,320 lbs MTOW. Completely reasonable for what is essentially a 2-seat overgrown ultralight. But the people who actually had the money to drop 5 or 6 figures on an airplane wouldn’t go near those contraptions. Instead they bought what were effectively 2-seat Cirruses with a starting price tag of $250-300k that just barely fit within the weight limit with 1 person.

MOSAIC is only going to affect two things. First is that prospective pilots who just want to fly recreationally in day VFR conditions will be able to skip the rigmarole and expense of getting a PPL by getting a Sport Pilot license in half the time and money while using standard aircraft that are already available in the training fleet. The second is that those who have a Light Sport Repairman with an Inspection rating will be able to do the annual condition inspection on an E-AB aircraft that they own, even if they didn’t build it.

If you want a cheap airplane you’ll have to do the same thing that everyone’s been doing for 40+ years: either buy used or build your own.

Aaron
Aaron
Reply to  jpayne
5 months ago

Isn’t affordability determined by price? Who sets the price?

Mike
Mike
Reply to  jpayne
5 months ago

The bare-bones LSAs the FAA anticipated never really caught on because they don’t actually win out cost-benefit wise–and it’s not “gee whiz gadgets” at fault. Costs (for manufacturing, and certification even under LSA) don’t scale much with capability; a two-seat “fat ultralight” still requires all the administrative burden of “certification” that an RV-12 does. It still needs at least an LSA-certified engine (and the LSA engine requirements look an awful lot like Part 33…). You may spend a little less on materials and assembly labor, but that’s only a small contributor. Engines, administration, overhead, and paperwork are the big killers; the pool of possible engines is small and all the admin costs are pretty flat regardless.

I think people expected 50% of the performance/capability at 50% of the cost; reality is you get 40% of the performance/capability at 85% of the cost.

In the end, the market spoke, and the market wanted to spend a little more money for a lot more capability.

There’s also fixed costs to consider… you could give airplanes away free, but it’ll do you no good when hangar rent alone is as much or more than the average car payment, nevermind insurance and maintenance (especially if you can’t do it yourself).

I don’t think the “fix” for affordable flying is factory-produced MOSAIC-compliant aircraft. I believe MOSAIC will help on the homebuilt and E-LSA side, and unleaded avgas may help some in the long run, but unless something can be done about skyrocketing hangar costs, insurance, and now landing fees… all LSAs will do is provide the next generation of trainers for those aspiring to the airlines.