Rotax: Mandatory Alert Gearbox Service Bulletin

Rotax has issued a mandatory Alert Service Bulletin for certain serial numbers of the certified 912 A, 912 F, 912 iSc Sport, 914 F, plus a similar mandatory Alert Service Bulletin for non-certified model 912 UL, 912 ULS, 912 iS Sport, and 914 UL engines. Dated June 22, 2026, the bulletins address potential issues in the propeller gearbox of the affected engines and require inspection for missing M7x16 hexagon screws (intended to secure the propeller shaft bearing in the propeller gearbox) and oil spray nozzle assembly. The bulletin says, in part, that the missing screws may allow axial displacement of the propeller shaft bearing that could result in a loss of oil and engine shutdown.

That’s the gearbox assembly removed from a 912 ULS.
(Photo: Larry Anglisano)

The good news is the failure won’t cause the propeller shaft to be pulled out of the gearbox housing. Rotax has listed the serial numbers of the engines requiring inspection inside the bulletins, and compliance is as follows:

  • On stored engines and spare parts: prior to their delivery.
  • On delivered engines and spare parts: before the initial installation, but at the latest after one year from the date of the initial issue of the Alert Service Bulletin.
  • On already installed engines and spare parts (with less than 25 hours of operation): carry out the inspection before the next flight but at the latest after one year from the date of the initial issue of the Alert Service Bulletin.
  • On already installed engines and spare parts (with more than 25 hours of operation): carry out the inspection at latest within the next five hours of operation, but at the latest after one year from the date of the initial issue of Alert Service Bulletin.

Rotax is providing a labor credit for work performed by technicians with a current applicable iRMT rating.

Larry Anglisano
Larry Anglisano
Larry Anglisano is editor of Smart Aviator and Instrument Aviator. He is an active land, sea, and glider pilot with over 25 years experience as an avionics specialist.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Latest
Related

14 COMMENTS

Subscribe to this comment thread
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Bill Jones
Bill Jones
24 days ago

“Hey – anyone know why we have all these extra M7x16 hexagon screws on the stock take?” 🙂

Shary
Shary
24 days ago

Item #24 on the IPC

bobd
24 days ago

Thank you, Larry and AvBrief, for this and other coverage of Rotax matters. It’s great that you guys recognize there are quite a few of us out here flying behind Rotax engines.

Bill Overdue
Bill Overdue
Reply to  bobd
23 days ago

There’s a lot of Rotax engines in service! Go to Rotax-Owners.com and sign up to recieve bulletins

bobd
Reply to  Bill Overdue
23 days ago

Thank you, Bill. I’m a long-time subscriber. I agree it’s an absolute must if you own a Rotax. I was just expressing my gratitude to AvBrief for publishing news items related to Rotax engines.

Bill Overdue
Bill Overdue
Reply to  bobd
23 days ago

👍…

Dan Marotta
Dan Marotta
24 days ago

Any one who flies behind (or in front of) a Rotax engine should look into joining Rotax-Owner.com. I got an email on this SB a day or two ago and always get timely information about the engines.

bobd
Reply to  Dan Marotta
24 days ago

I second that!

Paul Brevard
Paul Brevard
24 days ago

It’s interesting to note that the very same defect is found in both Experimental and Certified versions of the affected engines. Kind of ruins the illusion of Certified having a greater level of scrutiny.

Frank Vincent Tino
Frank Vincent Tino
Reply to  Paul Brevard
24 days ago

A ROTAX IS A ROTAX!

LetMeFly17
LetMeFly17
Reply to  Paul Brevard
24 days ago

I think I read that for Rotax, the only difference between the certified and experimental engines is the paperwork.

roger anderson
roger anderson
22 days ago

What does a Rotax turn up before the gear box reduces the prop shaft down?

CharlesP
CharlesP
Reply to  roger anderson
21 days ago

From memory 5,400RPM take-off and 5,200 continuous.

roger anderson
roger anderson
Reply to  CharlesP
21 days ago

Thanks.