
Brewer’s Alley looks like a place at which I’d be delighted to meet friends and colleagues after work for a couple of pints and maybe some of their trademark roasted Brussels sprouts to dissect the day’s events. It’s also the kind of place where you can call them at noon on a Wednesday and say you’ll be bringing about 100 like-minded folks at 4:30 and they’ll round up another bartender and a couple of servers, lay in some more calamari and deep-fried zucchini, and be ready to welcome you.
So it was at Frederick, Maryland’s first brewpub that about two-thirds of the folks who make AOPA tick gathered to celebrate a year with a boss they really liked and lament his ignominious dispatch from what is arguably general aviation’s most important job. It’s a testament to how the writers, the underwriters, the analysts, and the clerks who form the beating heart of the organization felt about President and CEO Darren Pleasance, whom they’d just gotten to know during his 13 months on the job.
They filed in, ordered drinks and snacks and as the beer loosened collars and tongues, they discussed the stiff and formal presentation by Board of Trustees Chairman Jim Hauslein who, earlier that day back at the office, awkwardly read a prepared statement telling them the guy they’d come to trust as having theirs and their important organization’s best interests at heart wasn’t the right guy for the job.
Many of them have worked there for decades and are damn good at their jobs. AOPA’s pay and benefits make jobs there some of the most sought after in aviation and there’s no denying that most are among the best at what they do. But over the years I’ve learned that despite all that, it’s not always the best place to work. There have only been a relatively few people in Pleasance’s job and not all of them were sent off with nibblies, craft beer, and a group hug. Some were figuratively propelled out the door with symbolic bootmarks on their butts.
Pleasance came to the job with a mission to implement change that would make the organization more relevant to a changing pilot population while redoubling efforts to protect a truly unique avocation that is both big business and heartfelt passion. It’s not an easy balance to strike, and Pleasance knew from the start that he wasn’t going to do it behind a knotted tie and immaculate desk in historic Frederick. He hit the road in jeans and a t-shirt and showed up at aviation events big and small, meeting his members and hearing them out. It shaped the way he tackled the necessary pile of paperwork that stacked on his desk in the meantime and apparently got him in trouble with the board of directors.
I don’t think anyone is buying that he was fired because he didn’t move to Frederick. That argument would be a lot stronger if he hadn’t, in fact, moved to Frederick. He bought a house there soon after getting the job, but he kept the one he and his wife love in Bend, Oregon. I remember when I first interviewed him a year ago he told me he spent two weekends a month in Bend and the rest of the time on the road or in Frederick. I’m not sure how much time was spent polishing that desk with his shirt sleeves, but as the last refuge for an employer who refuses to come clean about why they actually parted ways with him, it was painfully weak as cause for dismissal.
We may never know why he was actually fired. I’ve asked for an interview with Hauslein but there’s been no response so far. There has been no talk of misconduct or incompetence, so we are left to speculate on the real reasons and all roads lead to the board, its makeup, and its priorities. None of them live in Frederick and most of them fly jets. There are notable exceptions but they are in the minority. Most of them are money people and corporate honchos. I would have thought Pleasance, with his career pedigree at companies like Kinsey, Google and Cisco, would fit right in, but apparently not.
I first met him at NBAA in Vegas in 2024. He had just been named to the post and was taking over in January of 2025. I spotted him at a table full of other aviation bigwigs, introduced myself, and asked if he’d like to do a quick audio interview. He immediately said he’d be happy to and we agreed to meet after the fancy lunch in one of the enormous rooms at the convention center. He showed up on time and was full of apologies. He was forbidden from talking to me by his new employer but not for the reasons that usually happens. AOPA keeps a tight rein on its PR messaging and I assumed that they were afraid he might not have the background or experience to accurately express the party line.
No, he wasn’t allowed to introduce himself to the substantial audience I served in my previous life because it would steal thunder from the public relations extravaganza that AOPA was planning to roll out to their audience, which had significant overlap with my crowd. I actually kind of understood that. Media relevance is gained by getting it right and getting it first and you often can’t control the latter. When you can, you do. I didn’t actually get to sit down with him until about three months later.
But as I was mulling this blog, that episode in Vegas came to mind and I realized that in that moment I was not simply a reporter with a quota of NBAA stories to fill. I was competition. Me doing my job would have scooped the carefully orchestrated media extravaganza planned for Pleasance’s coming out. It got me thinking about all the other stuff AOPA does, and I’m not their only competitor by far.
AOPA has morphed from a group formed to represent the interests of general aviation into a mega-money machine with its fingers in all aspects of aviation business. It competes, and competes hard, with many thousands of its own members in everything from media and advertising (which interest me, of course) to insurance, credit cards, aircraft finance, and the list goes on. It’s been enormously successful. I haven’t looked at the books myself but the figure I hear most often about its investment accounts is somewhere north of $170 million. That’s a sizable piggy bank that grows every year and it makes me wonder what it’s for because while the bank account grows, the membership has shrunk in recent years.
If you believe the comments in various forums and social media channels, a whole bunch more people are quitting because they saw Pleasance as one of them, a guy who changes the oil on his RV-6 on his weekends in Bend and who sits in the shade of a 172’s wing to watch the airshow at whatever event he’s attending. They see his dismissal as a retreat from an AOPA that shares their concerns about hangar rents, unleaded avgas, and the inexorable creep of government regulation and oversight. They also think they’re being lied to about the reason his apparent efforts to change some things has been cut short.
This isn’t the normal pilot bitching about the nonstop barrage of special offers for everything from insurance to credit cards. This is a collective call for changes that have long been promised and scantily delivered. Pleasance was apparently viewed as the agent of that change and his shabby treatment at the hands of what seems to be assessed as an elitist cabal of fat cat jet-setters is not well received.
I’m sure there are nervous eyes watching those membership numbers back in Frederick as the search for Pleasance’s replacement gets underway. But there’s another metric they’re also keeping an eye on.

One of the practical realities of running a nominally democratic organization like AOPA is that it can’t function without a quorum in some circumstances. Since it can be like pulling teeth to get people to exercise their democratic privileges, most groups like this ask the largely complacent masses to sign proxies allowing their vote to be controlled by the board. On the various forums and channels I cruise regularly, I’ve seen dozens of AOPA members pledging to cancel their proxy agreements and start personally poking their noses in what is, after all, their own business.
That looms in importance because there are board elections coming up, and I’ve heard of at least one draft movement to install a new trustee it is believed will represent the views of the majority of members. It turns out it’s not easy to pry open that can of worms but it is possible, and the folks behind this effort are not easily cowed by mere bureaucratic challenges.
There’s not much time and the bylaw barriers to even getting a shot at running for that board are pretty complex, so they might not be successful this time around. But that’s just going to piss them off even more and you can bet those ducks will be perfectly in a row in time for the next election.
You see, AOPA, like the headquarters in Maryland, is made up of enormously talented and driven people who, when inspired, can move the mountains of B.S. they see as being in the way of building the kind of organization they want to represent them. AOPA’s board of trustees may be about to find out what it’s like to have competition.
As for my personal impression of Pleasance, I think he’s one of those relatively rare people who is utterly without guile. There is no malice or ulterior motive in anything he says or does and he generally wants everyone to benefit from his actions. I doubt he’s a saint (who among us is?) but he seems like he would make a good boss and leader. So it makes me wonder what the board is looking for in a replacement, other than a change of zip code.


One of your more frank and well written — albeit likely not popular (to AOPA) — articles, Russ. It says much about where your ‘head’ is, too. Likely why so many folks followed you over here. I hope the people in Chattanooga are paying attention? BTW … you’d better get yourself a bodyguard or two.
Well … ya convinced me that my heartburn with AOPA (and departure) has its roots in The Board and not the guy on the lead horse trying to keep the team on the right track. I guess I was judging Pleasance through the wrong set of glasses. I stand corrected.
“This isn’t the normal pilot bitching about the non-stop barrage of special offers for everything from insurance to credit cards.” … you reminded me of the wine clubs … I almost forgot about that one. “… his shabby treatment at the hands of what seems to be assessed as an elitist cabal of fat cat jet setters is not well received.” And THAT — in one sentence — pretty much sums up why I chose to become a lifetime EAA member. Selling a few T-shirts is one thing; trying to lure me in all those directions while simultaneously filling up my ‘in’ box with offers isn’t why I belong to an aviation organization.
I sincerely hope that any movement by AOPA members to unseat the people who have led them down the wrong path are successful. In the meantime, I’m betting that their membership will be speaking with their feet. Sad.
My feet voted yesterday, cancelling a membership that started in 1998.
Jim@Hauslein.com
If you have an opinion
Well said, Russ.
Hear hear!
Russ,
Cogent, thoughtful commentary. Many thanks
I believe EAA has done more for GA than AOPA. AOPA struts and boasts but in reality it seems like EAA has done more with basic med and mosaic and other items that impact me.
Early last year when Trump was going after all govt agencies, I talked with an AOPA senior staff member and told him now was the time for AOPA to go after the FAA, and give us more freedoms (aircraft condition inspections and drivers license instead of medical exams). The exec said he didn’t think the FAA would want to do that. Whose side are they on?
lee
I wasn’t going to say anything about this but — reading your comment — I will. Ahead of obvious MOSAIC implementation in late 2024, I asked to have a meeting with a part of the EAA team. They flew over to my summertime airport not far from OSH to listen to my presentation; they agreed that I had a good idea and they’d pursue it. Just two evenings ago, I met one of ’em plus a VP at a presentation in FL and was told they’re still working on it. Subject not important. What IS important is that they DO listen to their members and keep an open mind. How much better than that could it get? Contrast that with your comment on meeting with AOPA senior staff and their reaction. I might add that I view the wintertime ‘summit’ held in Oshkosh with FAA as THE single most impactful venue of change that GA has with FAA.
Russ, I’m glad I stuck with you – AvBrief is looking better all the time.
As for AOPA, I left with my 50-year pin and haven’t heard a thing from the organization in the way of enticement to return since. They left me.
There was a glimmer of hope when I found a retro-looking issue of the magazine and thumbed through it to find some interesting articles but none of them approached the spirit of the articles of 50 years ago and I didn’t rejoin.
I’m not pining for the good old days of Nancy Narco and posted results of spot landing contests, but I would like to have some good, gut-level, non-social-media-influencer content that communicates the shared fun that flying can bring. Maybe somebody will come up with that again because flying IS fun, even in this sterile age of acronyms and digits.
I left AOPA 15 years ago as I was fed up with the nonstop solicitations for PAC donations, benefits/discounts that weren’t all that good, and the distinct feeling that, as someone who was not a corporate jet guy, that I had little to no representation at the table. Russ, your piece is vindicating.
I switched to EAA all those years ago… worth it 100%. At least the EAA has a vested interest in the future of GA.
I have been an AOPA member for 48 years, but am now considering not renewing in July. I have found EAA more useful, but I fear EAA is following in AOPA’s footsteps, sadly. They seem to get more money focused every year.
Having concerns about EAA is justifiable, but their “AirVenture365” initiative/debacle caused so much blowback that I think they learned their lesson. They seem to have re-oriented pretty successfully in the aftermath of that – let’s hope the lesson sticks for a long time. MOSAIC and their other efforts are long-fought and hard-won battles which show they ‘put in the work’ for GA pilots.
AOPA member since 1985 and just cancelled auto-renewal on the web site.
Great article, Russ. I never thought about the proxy, but I will make that change now. Timing is everything. 2 days after they made this horrendous mistake, I get a form letter in the mail begging for money. This is why I just dislike AOPA. They are all about the money and don’t give 2 craps about GA.
Excellent analysis, Russ, and thank you for not indulging in schadenfreud (looking at you, Zoom).
When a small number of people moan, it might be schadenfreud. When a large number of people are humming the same tune … I call that REALITY.
You talking about Campbell? Is he still out there somewhere blathering?
Not to anyone who matters, thankfully.
As someone who has felt neglected by AOPA for years because I don’t burn kerosene, I understand everyone’s frustration, but this is the way of any organization that gets too big for it’s britches. I’ve seen it over the years with “rights” organizations like the AMA (American Motorcyclist Assoc.), the NRA (who, I think, singlehandedly keeps the USPS in business), and other, even charitable, organizations.
As an example, I gave a small donation to Wounded Warriors as a memorial gift at a friend’s funeral a year ago. Instead of a one-time thank you note, rarely has a week gone by without them asking for more money via USPS. That small donation I made, instead of helping a vet, paid a fraction of the printer ink, bribery gifts, postage, and paper expenditures trying to get more money out of me.
As someone who has rescued a pitbull, don’t get me started on what ASPCA is spending on their TV ads. Many dogs could be cared for with that money.
We have to accept the fact that organizations mostly exist for the sustenance of the institutions (and those high-paying gravy jobs) and vote with our wallets. Like others here, I hope the EAA doesn’t get like the AOPA, but it’s inevitable. Yes, my wife says I’m cynical, but everything is truly about the money.
Thanks for the very insightful comments. I’ve been an AOPA and EAA member for 50 years and for many years complained about EAA encroaching on tasks AOPA specialized in but now I’m thinking EAA may be one remaining advocate for my type of flying.
Sad to hear of the latest developments at AOPA. I had hoped they had moved on from the infamous “Presidents Monthly Wine List” era but apparently that mindset continues to lurk.
I’m uncomfortable with where the pendulum sits at EAA,. It appears Mr. Pelton’s focus is increasingly on the corporate donor, but at least the EAA volunteers keep that organization focused on the love of flying.
I know where I prefer to put my membership dollars.
Russ, thank you for the suggestion about the Proxy vote. Coincidentally, I logged into AOPA.org and saw a big banner that my “Proxy Expired! Be sure your vote is counted at the annual member meeting, even if you can’t attend!”
I’ve never seen that banner before. And my proxy had expired in 2016. Interesting in light of Darren’s departure.
I went into my account settings. There I found I can “Renew” or “Extend” my Proxy status. But there is no way to revoke or cancel it once it’s in place. And it lasts for three years.
So I wrote an e-mail to memberservices@aopa . org asking how to revoke a Proxy. I’ll post results if/when I hear back.
Looking through the old Annual Meeting minutes it appears about 80,000 proxies are active. If they were revoked then it would take just a small number of members to show up in person to overrule the Board’s decisions.
Next steps…
Get the membership to cancel their proxiesGet AOPA to change their site to allow remote voting (which might require a change in By-Laws).
I wrote to memberservices@aopa.org and had my proxy removed. They emailed me back confirmation they had done so within several hours.
I submitted this message on their contact form (URL below) and they removed my proxy within a couple of hours. I also cancelled my auto-renewal.
https://www.aopa.org/about/contact-aopa/inforequest
—
I wish to revoke my proxy vote. I will be exercising my rights as a member at the next meeting and in the future, and no longer relying on the board to vote on my behalf. The dismissal of Darren Pleasance has exposed the fact that the board is not acting in the best interest of the organization. Changes need to be made.
This written request is formal notification that I have revoked my proxy vote. I expect to see confirmation of this request.
Confirmed – AOPA replied to my e-mail to memberservices@aopa.org and revoked my proxy per my request.
The past 2 days of following the reactions to the dismissal of Darren Pleasance from reputable sources (including Russ Niles) was the push I needed to cancel my membership.
As I posted on the other related story, I just asked them to cancel my proxy, and if I don’t hear back from them I will terminate my membership in its 39th year.
I just sent this written notice to AOPA. I would urge you to do the same. Time to make the out-of-control board of trustees sweat a little bit. I submitted this message on their contact form (URL below) and they removed my proxy within a couple of hours. I also cancelled my auto-renewal.
https://www.aopa.org/about/contact-aopa/inforequest
—
I wish to revoke my proxy vote. I will be exercising my rights as a member at the next meeting and in the future, and no longer relying on the board to vote on my behalf. The dismissal of Darren Pleasance has exposed the fact that the board is not acting in the best interest of the organization. Changes need to be made.
This written request is formal notification that I have revoked my proxy vote. I expect to see confirmation of this request.
Russ – you are “spot on” – a perfect example of why I moved over to Avbrief.com !
I am a Life Member of EAA and AOPA, and have been for many years. For many reasons, I rather regret my Life membership in AOPA, but I am not dropping it at this point.
Amen Russ! Thanks for this fantastic editorial. I just sent AOPA a burner of a letter, recalled my proxy, and I’ll suggest that to our 11,000+ IAA Facebook followers.
Russ, AvBrief is quite the place. So glad I followed you here. Thanks for bare-bones reporting.
Russ, this fabulous. I learned a lot. It’s amazing how one chink in the armor reveals a whole lot of others. In response to his not being popular with AOPA. That’s not his job. his job is to question what is really going on and how it impacts the members. But I agree well written and well argued.
Good points raised, but those By-law barriers are indeed formidable. The Board of Trustees has the overall power over the association but limits who can become a member of that august body.
ARTICLE IVMEETINGS OF MEMBERSSection 1. All meetings of members shall be held at such place and time and for such purposes as the Board of Trustees, with its Chairman voting, shall decide. Meetings of members shall be presided over by the Chairman of the Board of Trustees who may, if there is less than a majority of the membership present in person or by proxy, declare the meeting postponed. Unless the meeting is postponed, any number of members in attendance shall constitute a quorum.
Section 2. Elections shall be by a majority of votes cast by members present in person or by proxy. The Board of Trustees shall designate a Nominating Committee of not less than two members. No person shall be a candidate for Trustee who has not been approved and recommended by the Nominating Committee.
Just fired this off to AOPA:
In a few weeks, I will have been a member of AOPA for forty years. I own, fly, and maintain an elderly Cessna 172A and a homebuilt experimental helicopter. I am not a commercial pilot nor ever been paid to fly. Early on I learned: Never take something you love, and turn it into a job.
For forty years I have remained a member of AOPA because I perceived it to be an effective lobbyist for GA in DC. However, I have seen few results that directly benefited me, and much effort expended on behalf of the “twin&turbine crowd”. This is evidenced by the content of your flagship publication, which I scan for anything relevant to my type of flying, and promptly toss on the recycle pile.
As a retired teacher, I have limited resources. My wife (and non-pilot accountant) has indulged my AOPA membership, and other aviation expenses, because I had been a pilot for nearly twenty years when we met. We have volunteered at Oshkosh every year for forty years. Every year I visit the AOPA booth to visit and talk with your staff. I know them to be enthusiastic pilots, committed to GA broadly, and professional.
Thus, I am forced to conclude that the abrupt “resignation” of Mr. Pleasance had more to do with the AOPA Board than the performance of his duties. Please discard the canard that this has anything to do with his unwillingness to relocate to MD. This episode has the grimy fingerprints of a Board issue all over it. If there is more going on than has been revealed, it is incumbent upon the Board to be more forthcoming.
It is with regret that I request that you DO NOT RENEW my membership when it expires at the end of March this year. Furthermore, I would like confirmation that this email has been forwarded to your Board of Directors. They appear to be the ones most responsible for the flood of membership cancellations you are seeing.
I’ve been a member of AOPA for 40+ years, just as I’ve been a member of the American Medical Association for the same amount of time. The two groups represent nearly the same number of individuals – pilots for one and physicians for the other. Both have a strong lobbying arm. Both have missions and visions that are sensible and well-balanced. The AMA is a truly democratic organization where members send over 500 delegates to a House meeting twice a year to form AMA policy. These delegates are responsible for voting for members of the board, and they generally do so in a manner that provides a fair amount of diversity on the board (geographic, practice specialty, age, etc.). AOPA, on the other hand, has a process which is largely invisible to members. I haven’t a clue as to how the AOPA determines its policy positions, because I’ve never had an opportunity to vote or to provide input. I don’t know how AOPA picks board members, again because I’ve never had a chance to pick other than through the superficial proxy process. I prefer the AMA’s approach, but there may be others who don’t mind being removed from the policy-making process, or who feel the AOPA does a perfectly good job determining policy without their input. Bottom line is that changing the AOPA bylaws would be, I suspect, impossible given how the AOPA is currently organized. The more likely way to achieve a truly democratic pilot organization would be to start one. Thanks, Russ, for addressing this issue….this is the first time I’ve ever seen it discussed in the open.
Russ, an excellent editorial, thank you!! You really spelled it out. Like many, i’ve been a member for a long time, since 1978! I’m not ready to resign my membership, yet. I’m going to give it some time and see what happens Hopefully some GOOD changes will result from all of this.
Russ, thanks for making the decision to hit the “Cancel” button this morning on my 23-year AOPA membership that much easier.
Great article Russ.
This article and the comments about it are why I canceled my membership about a year ago. Great article Russ.